🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. And, like many federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.