🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities we face.