🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create other types of electoral districts – including rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.